A.I.G. and Obama: Duped Again

Nearly perfect pre-dawn run, with the temp at 37 degrees and no wind here in NE Ohio. And when you are on the concrete at 5 a.m. you can rejoice in the fact that you are out of the Internet echo chamber and have some time to think. I was thinking this morning about how difficult it is these days for Obama, members of Congress and others to restore trust and confidence. And I’m convinced that has to happen before we are going to see any lasting economic recovery.

Think about it. The story erupts over the weekend that A.I.G. — ward of the U.S. taxpayer and poster child for just about everything that is wrong with the economy these days — is doling out $165 million in bonuses to the very executives who did the most damage to that company and to the world economy. Woot. And USA Today reports that this latest transfer of wealth is part of a larger payout of around $450 million. Not sure exactly what that means. More to come? Good grief. Keep in mind that Mr. and Ms. U.S. Taxpayer have written bailout checks to A.I.G. in the range of $170 billion.

OK. This gets the juices flowing on the Sunday talk shows — but apparently as it stands now there is no way to block the bonus payments. Here’s from The New York Times this morning:

The list, long sought by lawmakers, was released a day after the disclosure that A.I.G. was paying out hundreds of millions of dollars in bonuses to executives at the A.I.G. division where the company’s crisis originated. That drew anger from Democratic and Republican lawmakers alike on Sunday and left the Obama administration scrambling to distance itself from A.I.G.

“There are a lot of terrible things that have happened in the last 18 months, but what’s happened at A.I.G. is the most outrageous,” Lawrence H. Summers, an economic adviser to President Obama who was Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration, said Sunday on “This Week” on ABC. He said the administration had determined that it could not stop the bonuses.

But some members of Congress expressed outrage over the bonuses. Representative Elijah E. Cummings, a Democrat of Maryland who had demanded more information about the bonuses last December, accused the company’s chief executive, Edward M. Liddy, of rewarding reckless business practices.

“A.I.G. has been trying to play the American people for fools by giving nearly $1 billion in bonuses by the name of retention payments,” Mr. Cummings said on Sunday. “These payments are nothing but a reward for obvious failure, and it is an egregious offense to have the American taxpayers foot the bill.”

An A.I.G. spokeswoman said Sunday that the company would not identify the recipients of these bonuses, citing privacy obligations.

Ah, c’mon A.I.G. spokeswoman. Liar, liar panties on fire. Since the U.S. taxpayers essentially own A.I.G., don’t we have the right to know who we are rewarding for such excellent performance? By the way, how would you like to get up every day and have to be the spokesperson for A.I.G., Citigroup, Bernie Madoff and so on? I digress.

Anyway, the blowhards of the Beltway can huff and puff all they want about these really outrageous bonuses. But here’s the point. Shouldn’t someone at Treasury have known — or at least asked — about these bonuses before handing out billions in bailout cash as recently as a few weeks ago? And if the Treasury folks knew, why didn’t they say something before now? And if they asked A.I.G. management and didn’t get a straight reply, then something is wrong, ethically and maybe criminally.

In any event, the perception is that the public — all of us — have been lied to again. That we are getting our noses rubbed in it. And that’s not going to help Obama restore trust and credibility. I don’t think the American public likes being duped.

Wonder if Jon Stewart could get Edward M. Liddy, A.I.G’s CEO, to visit on The Daily Show. That sure worked out pretty well for Jim Cramer. Oh well.

And an update.

Last week I wrote –“Twittering the News” — about the story that made its way around Twitter and via blogs about The Plain Dealer and other newspapers headlined “The Ten Most Endangered Newspapers in America.” Pretty thin story actually. And later denied by The Plain Dealer. But the story, even in my little world of the Internet, made its way from person to person, site to site — and quickly. And few — including me — bothered to check the story before passing it on. And fewer still — although I did, thankfully — were quick to pass along the reply from The Plain Dealer.

Anyway, Ted Diadiun, the PD’s reader representative, wrote about this situation yesterday. It’s worth reading. It says a lot about journalism and about how we get and distribute information these days.

Advertisements

5 responses to “A.I.G. and Obama: Duped Again

  1. Obama and Geithner and Barney Frank all say they are “shocked that gambling is going on here”. These contracts were in place before Liddy was the CEO of AIG, and AIG is obligated to pay what they agreed to, whether the people are shmucks or swindlers or bums. This situation should have been addressed by Bush and Paulson and Barney Frank before the taxpayers were on the hook for anything. But the politicians were taking care of their own and they know it. Do not blame AIG for fulfilling its legally binding promises. Blame the people who gave taxpayer money to AIG knowing good and well that they were legally obligated to pay these ridiculous scandalous bonuses. Blame whoever authorized the money going to a company with these stupid deals. If giving money to AIG had to be done regardless, then so be it. Tell taxpayers the truth instead of pointing the finger at AIG. And no, The President of The United States and Congress do not, and should not, have the authority to mandate that these companies not be legally obligated to follow the law just because they got some taxpayer money. As taxpayers we should spend more time scrutinizing money being spent by our elected officials and blame them. Be angry at the politicians for allowing this to happen.

  2. PhilBucks….Amen! We are talking about less than 1% of the 173 BILLION in bailout money. People dont understand that AIG is obligated to pay these bonues. Do they realize the cost in court ordered punitive damages these employees would be awarded if the company breaks these contracts?? I would rather pay them my share, since I am now part owner, of less than a dollar. Why arent we more upset in the fact that we gave them the money in the first place, with no strings attached, than we are now for them living up to the contracts they agreed to??

    • OK. Burghthoughts is my brother. He knows I’m an asshole.

      Saying that — I don’t know about the legality of all this. Obama said he was going to ask the Treasury guys to look into that. Good. I think that’s right and important. Then I guess whatever happens, happens.

      I was making a different — yet I think important — point. Folks, we are being (1) lied to, or (2) mislead. And it doesn’t matter if the lies are coming from the administration, members of Congress, AIG — or all of the above. And until that stops, we ain’t going to have any trust and confidence and credibility. And that means we ain’t going to have any economic recovery.

      An example: two weeks (or so) ago we were told Citigroup needed another bailout and the taxpayer’s wrote another billion-dollar check. Then last week Citi execs leaked a memo that things weren’t so good — and the firm was operating at a profit. Ah, OK. Bonuses, anyone?

  3. Pingback: Obama: What Did He Know? And When? « PR on the run

  4. Not True!!!!!!!
    I really enjoy reading your perspective on the issues of the day.
    And honestly, i love you like a, well, brother!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s